Metropolis Reality Forums - Jury: eBay guilty of patent infringement

Sponsored by: The Fans!

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 24^th, 2024, 10:08am

Upcoming Premiere Dates:
Survivor 23, Season premiere
Thursday, September 14 (8:00-9:30 PM, ET/PT) on CBS

Metropolis Reality Forums Ť Jury: eBay guilty of patent infringement ť

   Metropolis Reality Forums
   Off-Topic Forums
   In the News (Moderators: lakelady, yesteach, MediaScribe, Bumper, Isle_be_back)
   Jury: eBay guilty of patent infringement

Previous topic | New Topic | Next topic »

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Notify of replies

Send Topic

Author

Topic: Jury: eBay guilty of patent infringement (Read 235 times)

Rhune
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 292

Jury: eBay guilty of patent infringement
« on: May 30^th, 2003, 12:26pm »

Quote

Modify

Jury: eBay guilty of patent infringement

By Alorie Gilbert
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
May 27, 2003, 8:10 PM PT

update A federal jury on Tuesday found eBay guilty of patent infringement and ordered the online auction giant to pay $35 million in damages.
A U.S. district Court jury sided with MercExchange of Great Falls, Va., which accused eBay in 2001 of infringing on three patents held by MercExchange founder Tom Woolston. The verdict determined that eBay and its Half.com subsidiary willfully infringed on two of those patents with their "Buy It Now" feature for fixed-price sales.

The willful infringement ruling opens the door for the judge to hold eBay liable for triple damages, or $105 million, said Neil Smith, an attorney specializing in intellectual property law at Howard Rice, a San Francisco firm. The judge may also issue an injunction against eBay to prevent the company from continuing to use the patented invention, a method for using a credit card to lock in an offer when purchasing items online, Smith said.

"The important implication is the specter of an injunction," Smith said. "It casts some uncertainly over the right to use the invention, which may impact the 'Buy It Now' feature at both eBay and Half.com. That feature certainly relates to a good chunk of their business."

Last year a judge ruled that the third patent, which covers online auction technology, is invalid and unenforceable.

eBay intends to ask the judge to set aside Tuesday's verdict and seek a new trial, said spokesman Kevin Pursglove. The evidence presented in the course of the trial doesn't justify the verdict, he said.

"In eBay's view, this dispute that is far from over," Pursglove added.

It's likely that eBay will move to appeal the verdict, Smith said. "It's not the end," he said. "They've certainly lost the first round and it's an important round because the U.S. jury system gives a lot of faith to what a jury does."

eBay has previously said that losing the case would have serious implications for the company, whose revenue last year was $1.2 billion.

"If the plaintiff were to prevail on any of its claims, we might be forced to pay significant damages and licensing fees, modify our business practices or even be enjoined from conducting a significant part of our U.S. business," eBay stated in an annual report filed in March to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Some fear that the verdict against eBay could prove counterproductive to the fledgling e-commerce industry, which has become increasingly litigious in recent years.

"I think it's a red flag to the Internet commerce industry that there's a whole slew of these patents that are issued that are basically what I would call well-known or common methods of doing business," said Norm Beamer, a partner at Fish & Neave, a law firm specializing in intellectual property.

"Right now it seems there is this looming problem of not very sensible patents that are nevertheless being used to threaten and extort people who are in business, and this appears to be one (being used against eBay) of them," he added.

Beamer represented eBay subsidiary PayPal before it was purchased by eBay but the companies no longer have ties to the firm.

During the Internet boom, U.S. courts ruled that business processes could be patented, leading numerous e-commerce companies to seek patent protection for their services. Amazon.com, Barnes&Noble.com and Expedia are among the major names to become entangled with patent suits, most of which ended in settlements.

Woolston began applying for the two patents at the heart of the case in the spring of 1995, some five months before eBay founder Pierre Omidyar launched the auction site.

Woolston said he is "walking on sunshine" over of the favorable verdict. The former technology expert for the CIA has prevailed in patent violation cases with other Internet companies before, including GoTo.com, now Overture Services. He enforced his patents with online car seller AutoTrader.com, which offers auctions as part of its service. He's also in the midst of a patent dispute with Priceline.com.

The trial, which was held in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Norfolk, lasted more than four weeks. Jury deliberations lasting more than two days.

IP Logged

Addams
You Bet Your ASS Team
ForumsNet Member

Gender:

Posts: 5398

Re: Jury: eBay guilty of patent infringement
« Reply #1 on: Jun 2^nd, 2003, 9:12am »

Quote

Modify

Thanks Rhune. I did see this. I can only expect the willful infringement finding will be appealed if it can be.

IP Logged

Rhune
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 292

Re: Jury: eBay guilty of patent infringement
« Reply #2 on: Jun 2^nd, 2003, 9:22am »

Quote

Modify

Well, there was some talk about this last year and according to the article I read back then, the guy who owned the original patent had gone back and modified it to include some stuff e-bay was doing, after the fact. My guess is that the one count they found em not guilty of may have related to that.

This guy was very slick about how he went about successfully suing them in court. He got his paperwork ready and then went after several smaller online auction sites, winning against those and establishing the law in favor on this before going after e-bay and the bigger companies.

IP Logged

darnchts
You Bet Your ASS Team
ForumsNet Member

Friends are God's Way of Taking Care of Us.

Gender:

Posts: 1190

Re: Jury: eBay guilty of patent infringement
« Reply #3 on: Jun 4^th, 2003, 8:05am »

Quote

Modify

everyone is too sue crazy today. It is so frustrating.

I use ebay to sell old Avon demos of mom's and if ebay raises the fees much more, I won't be able to do it since I absorb all the fees and don't expect mom to pay any of it, she just gets the profits and I eat the taxes to boot. I have been selling books on ebay to try to help with some of that expense and I charge extra for the shipping. But since you have to pay Ebay no matter if the item sells or not, it can get expensive. I have been doing this almost 3 years and the expense goes up more every year so I can imagine that they will use this as a reason to raise them more cause they know people will continue to use them. I also have noticed that they are becoming more concerned about what is sold which is not a bad thing. I guess it is no worse than any other business.

IP Logged

Friends are like pillars on your porch.
Sometimes they hold you up
and sometimes they lean on you.

Rhune
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 292

Re: Jury: eBay guilty of patent infringement
« Reply #4 on: Jun 4^th, 2003, 10:24am »

Quote

Modify

You can bet fees will go up. They are gonna have to pay their lawyers a lot of money to try and beat this case, and pay out even more money if they are ultimately unable to.

IP Logged

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Notify of replies

Send Topic


Previous topic \| New Topic \| Next topic »