Metropolis Reality Forums - Defense scores BIG in Peterson Case

Sponsored by: The Fans!

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 26^th, 2024, 3:01am

Upcoming Premiere Dates:
Survivor 23, Season premiere
Thursday, September 14 (8:00-9:30 PM, ET/PT) on CBS

Metropolis Reality Forums Ť Defense scores BIG in Peterson Case ť

   Metropolis Reality Forums
   Off-Topic Forums
   In the News (Moderators: lakelady, yesteach, MediaScribe, Bumper, Isle_be_back)
   Defense scores BIG in Peterson Case

Previous topic | New Topic | Next topic »

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Notify of replies

Send Topic

Author

Topic: Defense scores BIG in Peterson Case (Read 225 times)

david
Guest

Defense scores BIG in Peterson Case
« on: Jul 28^th, 2004, 7:16pm »

Quote

Modify

Remove

U.S. National - AP

Scott Peterson's Defense Scores Big Points

Wed Jul 28, 3:53 PM ET Add U.S. National - AP to My Yahoo!

By BRIAN SKOLOFF, Associated Press Writer

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. - Before he got hired as Scott Peterson (news - web sites)'s lawyer, Mark Geragos went on TV and declared that prosecutors had amassed a "damning circumstantial case" that Peterson murdered his pregnant wife.

AP Photo

AP Photo
Slideshow: Laci Peterson Case

It hardly looks that way now.

Nine weeks into the trial, a stumbling prosecution has let a deft defense gain such an advantage that without a tide-turning moment, Peterson will probably walk, trial-watchers agree. Nearly every day, defense lawyers explain away details that once seemed incriminating.

The $250,000 life insurance policy taken out on Laci Peterson (news - web sites)? A prosecution witness, the man who sold the policy, acknowledged suggesting the purchase and said Laci pushed for a higher amount.

The hair found on Scott Peterson's boat? Prosecutors said Peterson never showed Laci the boat, bought shortly before she disappeared. But Peterson's lawyers countered that a witness saw Laci at the warehouse where the boat was stored days before she vanished.

The cement anchors prosecutors say Peterson used to sink the body in San Francisco Bay? Extensive searches yielded nothing, and defense lawyers got a detective to admit that the plastic pitcher prosecutors said Peterson used to mold the anchors would not have worked.

And the defense has not even begun calling witnesses yet.

"If you were to stop this case today, I think everyone with a conscience would have to vote not guilty," said Dean Johnson, a former prosecutor and daily trial-watcher.

A dismissed juror confirmed that suspicion, griping that prosecutors presented witnesses out of logical order and tortured the panel with mind-numbing minutia.

With no clear-cut forensic evidence or eyewitness testimony connecting Peterson to the killing, prosecutors have relied on circumstantial evidence. Among other things: Peterson was having an affair, lied about it, and placed himself just miles from where the remains of Laci Peterson and the couple's unborn son washed ashore.

But the detours began with the prosecution's first witnesses, many of whom appeared to add nothing substantial to the case.

Prosecutors called a supermarket clerk who discussed in painstaking detail each item Laci Peterson bought on Dec. 23, 2002, the day before she was reported missing. Later, prosecutors called an expert to talk about plant material he tested at the request of police, never saying where it was found or why it was significant.

Prosecutors could still recover, with their last, best chance probably Peterson's mistress, Amber Frey. Aside from personal profit as his motive for murder, they allege he was obsessed with Frey and wanted to escape from what appeared to be a picture-perfect marriage.

"I think they are saving the best for last and hoping they can end like fireworks at a rock concert," Johnson said. But he added: "That's a very high-risk strategy. If it works, they end on a high note. If it fails ... they're in a lot of trouble."

There are other major prosecution witnesses to come among them Peterson himself, in wiretapped telephone calls with Frey and TV interviews in the weeks after his wife vanished. Police dog handlers are set to testify that their animals picked up Laci Peterson's scent at a marina where Peterson launched what he claims was a solo fishing trip the day she vanished. And a DNA expert will testify about the hair found on Peterson's boat.

But if Frey is to salvage the case, she must reveal something incriminating, not just tawdry details of the affair, according to prosecutor-turned-defense-attorney Michael Cardoza.

"They're certainly doing this backward," Cardoza said. "It's easier to convince somebody than to change their minds. And they're not convincing anyone."

Defense lawyers claim someone kidnapped Laci, then framed her husband after learning his alibi. The bodies washed up a few miles from the marina.

It's an argument Geragos once said wouldn't wash. But that was before he was hired by Peterson.

During the trial, Geragos has hammered away at detectives to show they bungled the investigation by ignoring leads that didn't point to Peterson one that Laci was held hostage, another from a convicted sex offender whose alleged confession police dismissed because he had mental problems.

On Thursday, Geragos will ask for a dismissal or a mistrial. His central claim: A detective was so intent on twisting what little he found to convict Peterson that he lied on the stand.

The judge is not expected to grant either request, and the prosecution still has one advantage that won't change, said another trial regular, former San Francisco prosecutor Jim Hammer.

"The bodies washed up within two miles of where he makes his impromptu fishing trip. That screams at you," Hammer said. He said prosecutors' best hope "is to really convince the jury on a very deep level that he's a sociopath. I don't think he comes across as a monster yet."

IP Logged

Rhune
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 292

Re: Defense scores BIG in Peterson Case
« Reply #1 on: Jul 28^th, 2004, 8:00pm »

Quote

Modify

It's like OJ all over again...watching the prosecution fumble and bore the jury to tears... Cry

IP Logged

david
Guest

Re: Defense scores BIG in Peterson Case
« Reply #2 on: Jul 28^th, 2004, 8:11pm »

Quote

Modify

Remove

My feelings exactly

IP Logged

Bumper
ForumsNet Moderator
Moderator
ForumsNet Member

A Virginia Member of the RED SOX Nation

Gender:

Posts: 2946

Re: Defense scores BIG in Peterson Case
« Reply #3 on: Jul 30^th, 2004, 9:29am »

Quote

Modify

From what I have seen, this case was going to be troublesome for the Prosecution from the very start. Circumstantial cases are always a crapshoot. The lack of forensic evidence doesn't help.

This case has gotten way too much publicity and for all intent and purposes, has been tried in the media. Fortunately, the Courts do not make decisions based on popular opinion. Mr. Petersen, however despicable he might be, (for running around on his pregnant wife, one of the few things we KNOW for sure) should be found Not Guilty if there is any doubt as to the facts of the case.

IP Logged

If U R reading these old posts, know that we were once a great, active cyber-community, but as in all things..Time moves on. This is now a Ghost Town.

david
Guest

Re: Defense scores BIG in Peterson Case
« Reply #4 on: Jul 30^th, 2004, 9:37am »

Quote

Modify

Remove

Personally I think he did it but if I sat on jury I couldnt not convict him on the case (or lack of) that has been built againist him! This case reeks of "Reasonable Doubt"

IP Logged

Bumper
ForumsNet Moderator
Moderator
ForumsNet Member

A Virginia Member of the RED SOX Nation

Gender:

Posts: 2946

Re: Defense scores BIG in Peterson Case
« Reply #5 on: Jul 30^th, 2004, 9:55am »

Quote

Modify

on Jul 28^th, 2004, 7:16pm, david wrote:

U.S. National - AP

Nine weeks into the trial, a stumbling prosecution has let a deft defense gain such an advantage that without a tide-turning moment, Peterson will probably walk, trial-watchers agree. Nearly every day, defense lawyers explain away details that once seemed incriminating.

Not really fair to call the prosecution "stumbling". You cannot make all the facts "exciting" or "dramatic". It is their DUTY to lay out ALL the facts they have, however trivial, however boring. That is the duty of the state. To do less would invite appeal problems. It's not the Prosecution's duty to entertain the gadflys over at CourtTV. You do the best you can with what you've got!

. . . . That being said, It's hard to make chickensalad out of chickenshit. Wink

IP Logged

If U R reading these old posts, know that we were once a great, active cyber-community, but as in all things..Time moves on. This is now a Ghost Town.

david
Guest

Re: Defense scores BIG in Peterson Case
« Reply #6 on: Jul 30^th, 2004, 10:00am »

Quote

Modify

Remove

Your wit and wisdom NEVER cease to amaze me Bump! Cool

IP Logged

luci
ForumsNet Member

Gender:

Posts: 12045

Re: Defense scores BIG in Peterson Case
« Reply #7 on: Jul 30^th, 2004, 10:05am »

Quote

Modify

David, he's been there, knows that of which he speaks!
It is understandable why law enforcers get disgusted with the system.
This case we look to end in an acquital or not-guilty verdict ,ala OJ! Angry

« Last Edit: Jul 30^th, 2004, 10:06am by luci »

IP Logged

"A friend is someone who knows the song in your heart and
can sing it back to you when you have forgotten the words."

AoM
ForumsNet Member

Posts: 2277

Re: Defense scores BIG in Peterson Case
« Reply #8 on: Jul 30^th, 2004, 11:02am »

Quote

Modify

I wish they hadn't rushed into this, they could have waited to gather more evidence, or waited til he actually did skip the country and then extradited him, running away in and of itself is pretty damning evidence

They always try to rush it. He did it. Not a doubt in my mind he did it. But they can't prove it and the SOB is gonna walk. Maybe he OJ, and Gary(?) Hacking can team up to find the "real killers of their wives"

IP Logged

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Notify of replies

Send Topic


Previous topic \| New Topic \| Next topic »