Metropolis Reality Forums - Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, son

Sponsored by: The Fans!

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 25^th, 2024, 9:44pm

Upcoming Premiere Dates:
Survivor 23, Season premiere
Thursday, September 14 (8:00-9:30 PM, ET/PT) on CBS

Metropolis Reality Forums Ť Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, son ť

   Metropolis Reality Forums
   Off-Topic Forums
   In the News (Moderators: lakelady, yesteach, MediaScribe, Bumper, Isle_be_back)
   Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, son

Previous topic | New Topic | Next topic »

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Notify of replies

Send Topic

Author

Topic: Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, son (Read 301 times)

Rhune
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 292

Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, son
« on: Nov 12^th, 2004, 3:34pm »

Quote

Modify

Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, son
Possible sentences are death, life without parole
Friday, November 12, 2004 Posted: 4:31 PM EST (2131 GMT)

REDWOOD CITY, California (CNN) -- Jurors found Scott Peterson guilty Friday of first-degree murder in the death of his pregnant wife and second-degree murder in the death of their unborn son.

The verdict -- reached by a six-man, six-woman panel -- leaves Peterson facing a possible sentence of death or life in prison without parole.

Prosecutors had accused Peterson of killing his 27-year-old wife, Laci Peterson, on or around December 24, 2002, in their home in Modesto, California. They said he dumped her body, weighted with homemade cement anchors, in San Francisco Bay. He had bought a boat not long before her death.

After 184 witnesses testified over a period of 23 weeks, defense attorney Mark Geragos said in closing arguments that prosecutors had introduced no direct evidence that Peterson killed anyone, and he admonished jurors to weigh only the evidence and to put aside their feelings about his client.

"I don't care if you hate Scott Peterson," Geragos had said.

During his closing arguments, prosecutor Rick Distaso told jurors that it was a common-sense case in which a man killed his wife and that Peterson was the only one who could have killed Laci.

The verdict came after San Mateo Superior Court Judge Alfred Delucchi's dismissal and replacement Tuesday of juror No. 7, a woman who reportedly did her own research on the case. On Wednesday, the judge dismissed juror No. 5, a doctor and lawyer who was the panel's foreman. The reason for his dismissal was not given.

Replacement juror No. 6, a firefighter, was named the new jury foreman. Court watchers observed that he took few notes during the trial and appeared bored at times. CNN's Rusty Dornin said sources said the new foreman may have been able to smooth over tensions in the jury room.

During the trial, the defense maintained that police bungled the investigation and targeted Peterson to the exclusion of other viable suspects. Geragos claimed Peterson was framed, possibly by a homeless person or a burglar.

Distaso also theorized that Peterson's motive was not to continue an admitted affair with massage therapist Amber Frey, but freedom from the burden of a wife and son, or if he became divorced, freedom from paying child support.

Geragos said his client would never kill his wife to be with a woman he had gone out with only a few times, even telling jurors of Peterson's two previous affairs.

Geragos pointed out that those weights were never found.

"If there were anchors, why didn't they find them?" Geragos asked jurors in his summation.

Laci Peterson was about eight months pregnant when she disappeared.

Scott Peterson was arrested April 18, 2003, just days after the remains of Laci and their unborn son, whom they planned to name Conner, washed ashore separately in San Francisco Bay near the marina where Peterson said he launched his boat on a fishing trip he took Christmas Eve 2002.

He had dyed his hair blonde and had nearly $15,000 in cash. Prosecutors said he was preparing to flee to Mexico.

On January 24, 2003, Frey stepped up to a microphone and told reporters that she had been having an affair with Peterson before and after his wife went missing.

She said she began cooperating with police when she found out her lover had lied to her about many things, including his marital status.

During his trial, the prosecution played tapes of phone calls Peterson made to Frey while searches were under way for his missing wife.

The calls between Peterson and Frey revealed a web of lies by the defendant, including his statement to her that he celebrated New Year's 2003 near the Eiffel Tower.

In fact, the day that call was made he attended a candlelight vigil for his wife in Modesto.

Jury selection in the trial began March 4, and opening statements started June 1.

Before the six men and six women began deliberating November 3, the judge told jurors they had two choices if they decided to convict: first-degree murder, carrying a possible death sentence or life without parole; and second-degree murder, with the potential of two sentences of 15 years to life.

Delucchi explained, "First-degree murder you need ... expressed malice and intent to kill and premeditation."

Second-degree, he said, means Peterson killed them but didn't plan it. The judge added the lesser charge after finding there was ample evidence to support a case that did not involve premeditation.

The option of the lesser charge was a victory for prosecutors, because evidence against Peterson was largely circumstantial.

CNN's Rusty Dornin contributed to this report.

IP Logged

Rupey
ForumsNet Member

Can't top Pearl Islands!

Posts: 2147

Re: Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, so
« Reply #1 on: Nov 12^th, 2004, 8:58pm »

Quote

Modify

IP Logged

"Lord, please make me the person my dog thinks I am."

AoM
ForumsNet Member

Posts: 2277

Re: Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, so
« Reply #2 on: Nov 13^th, 2004, 7:51am »

Quote

Modify

thank goodness! We don't need another wife killer going free!

IP Logged

Rupey
ForumsNet Member

Can't top Pearl Islands!

Posts: 2147

Re: Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, so
« Reply #3 on: Nov 13^th, 2004, 5:38pm »

Quote

Modify

on Nov 13^th, 2004, 7:51am, Angelofmercy wrote:

thank goodness! We don't need another wife killer going free!

Wife/baby killer.

IP Logged

"Lord, please make me the person my dog thinks I am."

Rhune
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 292

Re: Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, so
« Reply #4 on: Nov 13^th, 2004, 11:11pm »

Quote

Modify

Yeah, this guy went above and beyond your typical wife killer...what was done to the baby was just sickening. It's hard to imagine someone capable of that.

IP Logged

Bumper
ForumsNet Moderator
Moderator
ForumsNet Member

A Virginia Member of the RED SOX Nation

Gender:

Posts: 2946

Re: Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, so
« Reply #5 on: Nov 14^th, 2004, 12:15pm »

Quote

Modify

Unfortunately, I think there will be lots of appeals for this case before it is all over. We may not have seen the last of this case.

IP Logged

If U R reading these old posts, know that we were once a great, active cyber-community, but as in all things..Time moves on. This is now a Ghost Town.

Rupey
ForumsNet Member

Can't top Pearl Islands!

Posts: 2147

Re: Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, so
« Reply #6 on: Nov 15^th, 2004, 9:49am »

Quote

Modify

I'm sure you're right, Bump.

IP Logged

"Lord, please make me the person my dog thinks I am."

AoM
ForumsNet Member

Posts: 2277

Re: Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, so
« Reply #7 on: Nov 15^th, 2004, 10:13am »

Quote

Modify

Yeah, they will appeal

But the fact that he was found guilty in his first trial...man

yes..wife AND baby killer. God what a sicko...I guess he's the true definition of Sociopath

IP Logged

avsfanbuck
ForumsNet Member

Pulling W. Out for another Party!

Gender:

Posts: 2167

Re: Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, so
« Reply #8 on: Nov 15^th, 2004, 1:07pm »

Quote

Modify

Personally from all of the information that was given there still would be that doubt in my mind and I think that he is inocent. That is all the Defense has to do is a doubt

IP Logged

You all Know that Cappy is coming back for All Stars!

Rupey
ForumsNet Member

Can't top Pearl Islands!

Posts: 2147

Re: Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, so
« Reply #9 on: Nov 15^th, 2004, 3:05pm »

Quote

Modify

I'm sure that Geragos is hoping to gain sympathy from those who feel like you do, Avs.

To me, I have to wonder how a husband who DIDN'T murder his wife and their unborn son could remain not only very composed and even smiling during the vigils and searches they had for her but could also carry on an affair, sell his wife's car, inquire about the selling price of their house, and disguise his appearance while carrying more money than most of have close to the Mexican border. Hmmm Huh

?? Not to mention that he referred to his wife in the past during a TV interview and he had a boat that his wife knew nothing about...before her death.

IP Logged

"Lord, please make me the person my dog thinks I am."

Rhune
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 292

Re: Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, so
« Reply #10 on: Nov 15^th, 2004, 6:29pm »

Quote

Modify

^
l
l

What she said!

« Last Edit: Nov 15^th, 2004, 6:29pm by Rhune »

IP Logged

AoM
ForumsNet Member

Posts: 2277

Re: Jury finds Peterson guilty of killing wife, so
« Reply #11 on: Nov 15^th, 2004, 8:19pm »

Quote

Modify

100% AGREE!!

what innocent man heads for mexico with a new goatee and a new hair color with 15 grand in his pocket?

Framed? uh huh yeah sure

IP Logged

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Notify of replies

Send Topic


Previous topic \| New Topic \| Next topic »