Metropolis Reality Forums - First national suit over education law

Sponsored by: The Fans!

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 25^th, 2024, 9:29am

Upcoming Premiere Dates:
Survivor 23, Season premiere
Thursday, September 14 (8:00-9:30 PM, ET/PT) on CBS

Metropolis Reality Forums Ť First national suit over education law ť

   Metropolis Reality Forums
   Off-Topic Forums
   In the News (Moderators: lakelady, yesteach, MediaScribe, Bumper, Isle_be_back)
   First national suit over education law

Previous topic | New Topic | Next topic »

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Notify of replies

Send Topic

Author

Topic: First national suit over education law (Read 179 times)

Rhune
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 292

First national suit over education law
« on: Apr 20^th, 2005, 6:47pm »

Quote

Modify

First national suit over education law
Wednesday, April 20, 2005 Posted: 1:26 PM EDT (1726 GMT)

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The nation's largest teachers union and school districts in three states Wednesday launched a legal fight over No Child Left Behind, aiming to free schools from complying with any part of the education law not paid for by the federal government.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for eastern Michigan, is the most sweeping challenge to President Bush's signature education policy. The outcome would apply only to the districts involved but could have implications for all schools nationwide.

Leading the fight is the National Education Association, a union of 2.7 million members that represents many public educators and is financing the lawsuit. The other plaintiffs are nine school districts in Michigan, Texas and Vermont, plus 10 NEA chapters in those three states and Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Utah.

Education Secretary Margaret Spellings, as the chief officer of the agency that enforces the law, is the only defendant. The suit centers on a question that has overshadowed the law since Bush signed it in 2002: whether the president and Congress have provided enough money.

The challenge is built upon one paragraph in the law that says no state or school district can be forced to spend its money on expenses the federal government has not covered.

"What it means is just what it says -- that you don't have to do anything this law requires unless you receive federal funds to do it," said NEA general counsel Bob Chanin.

"We want the Department of Education to simply do what Congress told it to do. There's a promise in that law, it's unambiguous, and it's not being complied with."

The plaintiffs want a judge to order that states and schools don't have to spend their own money to pay for the law's expenses -- and order the Education Department not to try to yank federal money from a state or school that refuses to comply based on those grounds.

Spending on No Child Left Behind programs has increased 40 percent since Bush took office, from $17.4 billion to $24.4 billion, federal figures show.

Responding to the suit, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said Bush has overseen "historic levels of funding" and a commitment to holding schools to high standards. States are making strong achievement gains under the law, and Spellings has made it clear she will help state leaders as long as they are making proven progress under the law, Perino said.

Yet the suit accuses the government of shortchanging schools by at least $27 billion, the difference between the amount Congress authorized and what it has spent. The shortfall is even larger, the suit says, if the figures include all promised funding for poor children.

The suit, citing a series of cost studies, outlines billions of dollars in expenses to meet the law's mandates. They include the costs of adding yearly testing, getting all children up to grade level in reading and math, and ensuring teachers are highly qualified.

To cover those costs, the suit says, states have shifted money away from such other priorities as foreign languages, art and smaller classes. The money gap has hurt schools' ability to meet progress goals, which in turn has damaged their reputations, the suit says.

Plaintiffs include the Pontiac School District in Michigan, the Laredo Independent School District in Laredo, Texas; the Rutland Northeast Supervisory Union in Brandon, Vermont; and six of the school districts that are part of Rutland Northeast in south central Vermont.

The NEA promised to bring the suit almost two years ago and began recruiting states to be plaintiffs. But the union found no takers -- in part because states had no firm cost estimates, and in part because states were wary of the political fallout of suing the federal government.

More than a dozen states, however, are considering anti-No Child Left Behind legislation this year. On Tuesday, the Utah Legislature passed a measure giving state education standards priority over federal ones imposed by No Child Left Behind.

The school districts involved in the lawsuit give the NEA the diversity it wanted, from rural Vermont students to limited-English learners in Laredo to poor students in Pontiac. In the suit, Spellings is accused of violating both the education law and the spending clause of the U.S. Constitution.

The NEA and the Bush administration have had a testy relationship.

When the union first promised the lawsuit, then-Education Secretary Rod Paige accused the NEA of putting together a "coalition of the whining." He later referred to the NEA as a "terrorist organization" for the way it opposed the law, a comment for which he later apologized.

------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press.

IP Logged

lovetrivia
ForumsNet Member

Gender:

Posts: 1644

Re: First national suit over education law
« Reply #1 on: Apr 20^th, 2005, 7:12pm »

Quote

Modify

I hope this is good news. Some action being taken against a very bad law. Nickname (No Child Left behind) makes it sound like something good. The "real" name of the bill is The Elementary and secondary Education Act.

IP Logged

Disney #1 Fan

Rhune
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 292

Re: First national suit over education law
« Reply #2 on: Apr 20^th, 2005, 8:04pm »

Quote

Modify

I don't think I've ever heard anything positive about this program, unless it came out of the mouth of a politician. I've yet to meet a single educator that is happy with this program or sees any benefit out of it.

IP Logged

lovetrivia
ForumsNet Member

Gender:

Posts: 1644

Re: First national suit over education law
« Reply #3 on: Apr 20^th, 2005, 8:38pm »

Quote

Modify

I am an educator. I'm in PA. When this law was passed I was told it was here to stay - nothing could be done. So this gives me hope. Most teachers, keep teaching and believing in what we do, follow the laws that are made and teach our students despite pressure to test, test, test. It is hard though always feeling more pressure. And it is so unequal - school districts are, so the law is so unfair.

IP Logged

Disney #1 Fan

yesteach
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 10465

Re: First national suit over education law
« Reply #4 on: Apr 30^th, 2005, 4:10pm »

Quote

Modify

I agree... I hate NCLB... it's ruined careers (teachers who've had to change assignments after YEARS of successful teaching, just because they don't have the "right" degree). We have a teacher who is a brilliant science teacher, junior high level, and she's had to give up that position because her degree isn't in science - never mind the fact that she's been successfully teaching science for the past 7 years!! Truly sad!

Add to that all the test, test, test... I've been told since Christmas, the only things I'm supposed to teach are math and reading, because that's all that is tested... VERY sad situation when we don't bother to teach anything that's not "on the test".. Sad

IP Logged

There are only 10 types of people in the world... those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Notify of replies

Send Topic


Previous topic \| New Topic \| Next topic »